By Walter Perry, Bruce Pirnie, John Gordon, Louis Moore, Robert Howe
This file analyzes the military Transformation Wargame 2000 and its implications for the method of a military in 2015.
Read or Download A Report on the Army Transformation Wargame 2000 PDF
Similar military sciences books
This booklet integrates technique, know-how and economics and provides a brand new approach of twentieth-century army heritage and Britain's decline as an exceptional energy. G. C. Peden explores how from the Edwardian period to the Nineteen Sixties battle was once reworked through a chain of ideas, together with dreadnoughts, submarines, plane, tanks, radar, nuclear guns and guided missiles.
RAND studied 89 glossy insurgency situations to check traditional knowing approximately how insurgencies finish. Findings appropriate to policymakers and analysts contain that glossy insurgencies final approximately ten years; withdrawal of nation aid cripples insurgencies; civil safety forces are beneficial for each side; pseudodemocracies fare poorly opposed to insurgents; and governments win extra usually ultimately.
This is often a precise replica of a booklet released prior to 1923. this isn't an OCR'd ebook with unusual characters, brought typographical blunders, and jumbled phrases. This booklet can have occasional imperfections similar to lacking or blurred pages, bad photographs, errant marks, and so on. that have been both a part of the unique artifact, or have been brought through the scanning procedure.
- Tarnished: Toxic Leadership in the U.S. Military
- Goal Programming: Methodology and Applications
- PTSD Compensation and Military Service
- Nation-Building and Stability Operations: A Reference Handbook (Contemporary Military, Strategic, and Security Issues)
Extra resources for A Report on the Army Transformation Wargame 2000
S. , 2000h. ” Armed Forces Journal International, May 2000, pp. 30–33.
No landlines of communications were established and the distances were beyond the range of existing rotary-wing aircraft. To support this maneuver, either the CSS units would have to be equipped with FTRs or the combatant commander would have to allocate large numbers of C-130 sorties to sustain the Objective Force units. If C-130s were used, the Objective Force units would be tethered to landing fields. In either case, the combatant command would need to establish secure air corridors. Medical support would be of particular concern during such deep operations.
White Team The White Team included a Chief Mentor, Game Direction, Assessment (Assessment Team 1 and Assessment Team 2), and an Analysis Team. The Chief Mentor developed insights for the Game Director, based on observation of the Operational Insights Panels. Game Direction was responsible for overall conduct of the game. Assessment adjudicated outcomes of opposing plans and identified key insights. The Training and Doctrine Command’s Analysis Center led the Analysis Team with support from RAND.